Energy Resources

Welcome to Poorna's Pages at the Glendale Community College. Here we discuss the geological or extractive earth resources. Note that these resources are largely nonrenewable or exhaustible to potentially renewable and broadly comprise water and soil, minerals and energy resources. Water (surface and underground) and soil have been examined elsewhere earlier, mineral resources are examined elsewhere in this module, and energy resources are being discussed on this page.

Home

My Book

Geol-101

Geol-102

Geol-112

 

Ocean-115

Ocean-116

 

Updated on May 05, 2015

 

Contents of the
other Modules

 

Other topics in this Module:

bullet

Glaciers and glaciation

bullet

Waves, beaches and the coasts

bullet

Mineral resources

bullet

The earth hazards

bullet

Nature and dimensions of environmental crisis

 

On this page ...

bullet

Energy Resources

bullet

Fossil Fuels
Coal, Oil and Natural Gas
How much oil do we have

bullet

Nuclear Energy

bullet

Futuristic Energy Sources
Fusion technology, OTEC, Gas Hydrate Gel

     

Selected WWW Links

bullet

US Energy Information Administration

bullet

United States Geological Survey

bullet

World Watch Institute

bullet

British Petroleum's Statistical Review of World Energy

Suggestions are most welcome here, as elsewhere, of course.

 

Poorna's Materials

bullet

Energy Resources
(a MS Word Handout)

bullet

Dateline 2010: Energy Boom
or Crunch (a presentation in MS PowerPoint)

 
 
 
 
   

Energy Resources

matter most because energy
 

bullet

defines the modern technological society;

bullet

is essential for economic growth; and therefore

bullet

governs our continued economic well being.


Not surprisingly, therefore, the relation between energy consumption and economic prosperity is direct, as can be seen from the bottom graph on the right.

 

The energy resources of direct geological interest can be broadly grouped into three classes:

 

bullet Fossil fuels
bullet

Coal,

bullet

Oil or Petro-leum, and

bullet

Natural Gas.

bullet Radio-
active minerals for Nuclear Energy
bullet

Conventional  reactors,

bullet

Breeder reactors, and

bullet

Nuclear fusion

bullet

Other potential alternatives

bullet

Conventional ― hydroelectric,  geothermal, tides, wind, waves etc.

bullet

Futuristic ― OTEC (ocean thermal energy conversion) or thermocline energy, Methyl hydrate gel, Kelp farming etc.

 

 

The Fossil Fuels

These comprise coal, oil and natural gas, all
of organic origin. Of these,

For energy resources, a starting point would be the US Department of Energy site http://www.osti.gov/. Click on the above image to access this site.

bullet

coal forms from plant remains and
the sequence for coal formation can be simplified as follows,

ancient rain forests ® peats
and bogs
® lignite ® coal



where coal itself implies increasing grade from subbituminous to bituminous to anthracite, the most prized of all.

The U.S. coal deposits 

Coal naturally occurs in sedimentary layers and the act that the large land plants did not evolve until well into the Paleozoic too makes the exploration for coal a relatively simple matter. In the U.S., for instance, extensive beds of bituminous coal occur in the late Paleozoic (Pennsylvanian to Mississippian and Permian), over a vast region that stretches from Pennsylvania to Alabama. Appalachian folding has also produced anthracite beds in northeastern Pennsylvania. The interior fields, covering the region from Michigan through Illinois to Texas, too carry bituminous coal and belong to the same geological horizons. As against these, coal beds of the far western fields that extend from New Mexico to Montana, North Dakota and Canada, are of Cretaceous to Eocene age and often tend to be either lignite or subbituminous coal.

 

The U.S. is particularly rich in coal, with about 290 billion tons of recoverable reserves. World reserves of coal are estimated at about one trillion tons, and the total resources about ten times as much.

   
bullet

Oil and natural gas, on the other hand, form from the decomposition of shallow marine microorganisms and are found in suitable ‘traps’ (structural and stratigraphic).

 

The illustration of
 structural (A: anticline,
B: fault and C: salt
 dome) and strati-
graphic (D) traps.
 

bullet How much oil do we have?

The world economy continues to depend heavily on the fossil fuels (which accounted for 85% of the energy source in 2000 and may command a higher proportion in 2020, according to the U.S. Department of Energy). The growth is likely to be much faster for oil, of which our supplies are limited, than for coal, whose supplies are abundant but utilization carries a greater risk of environmental degradation.

The USGS estimates total U.S. reserves of discovered oil at 279 BBO (billion barrels of oil), for instance, 61% of which has been already used up. Likewise, about 62% of the discovered 230 BBOE (billion barrels of oil equivalent) U.S. gas reserves too have been used up. While much of recent exploration and drilling has therefore shifted off-shore, mainly to the Gulf of Mexico, focus is also shifting to the debate on Alaska's North Slope (the map on the bottom left) and to tapping the extensive Athabasca tar sand in Canada, with estimated reserves of about 1.25 trillion barrels of oil. Similar oil sands also occur elsewhere in North America (see the map on the bottom right), the richest of the U.S. occurrences being the Green River formation.

 

The U.S. economy has become particularly vulnerable to the imminent paucity of oil, nonetheless, more so because the actual practice in the U.S. is to abandon an oil well when less than 40% of the oil remains! Does this mean that the end of oil is in sight, as the geophysicist King Hubbert had argued in a Scientific American article in 1971 by predicting that 80% of the world's oil endowment will get exhausted by 2929-25 (the seeds of this idea can be found in Hubbert's article in Feb 4, 1949 issue of Science), or that it is only the cheap oil that we are worried about?

The key to Hubbert's prophecy (the critics would call him an alarmist, though) lies in estimating the dynamic depletion time for a resource which he defined as the time when 80% of it has been used up. As can be surmised from the box alongside, while Hubbert's strategy incorporates the past pattern, the inference based on it needs to be continually updated.

Computing the Hubbert Curve

The genius of Dr. Hubbert lay in computing a bell-shaped curve that peaks when 50% of the target resource is used up (depletion time is defined here as the time when 80% of the resource has been used up). Suppose F is the fraction of the resource that has been consumed. Thus, the fraction remaining = (1-F). Being a function of technology as well as supply-demand equilibrium (i.e., the greater the demand the greater the impetus for technological innovation by way of enhanced investments), the total endowment is an unknown quantity, of course, but the cumulative consumption and its trend, that should embody these economic and technological factors, are known. Thus, if we now define a ratio F1 = F/(1-F), then this ratio can be computed, as a function of time (T), for the known and progressively rising estimates of the total resource endowment. Note that F1 rises exponentially with time,  i.e., F1 = 0 when F = 0, F1 = 1 when F = 0.5 and F1 à infinity as F à 1. Thus, if we set F1 = exp (A+B×T), where A and B are constants that can be estimated from linear regression of the observed F1 against T (just define y = ln F1 = A+B×T), then we have managed to define the observed data by a predictor equation that hopefully extends into the future!

The graph on the bottom left compares the cumulative world oil production through history for different assumptions about the world's total endowment. Notice how the model mimics the observed data reasonably well if the geological estimation of world's total petroleum availability is 1.4 billion barrels. Recently, though, the USGS has revised this estimate upwards, as is shown in the table presented below, to about 3 BBO for oil and about 5.6 BBOE for oil and natural gas combined.

 

That technology has stayed abreast of the demand is precisely what the worldwide data on consumption and reserve estimates since 1971 clearly suggest (the data tabulated alongside are from British Petroleum's 2003 statistical review of world energy).

Notice that world's total proved oil reserves were estimated at 641.8 billion barrels in 1971. For the 1971 annual oil production (and consumption) of 18.4 billion barrels, this implied an estimate of 34.9 (= proved reserves/annual production) as the number of years this supply would last. By 2001, a full 30 years later, this estimate increased to 38.6 years (= 1050 billion barrels proved estimates/27.2 billion barrels 2001 production), even though production now was about one and a half times that in 1971!

Nuclear Energy
 

bullet

Technology and Source Materials:

Click below to browse Nuclear Energy Institute’s website


Three types of nuclear technology exist:

or visit International Atomic Energy Agency's WorldAtom site  for current news and activities in the field of atomic energy

 

bullet

Conventional technology uses

    either the  235U-based "burning" reactors, or  

 

 

the 238U-based "breeder" reactors, whereas

 

 

bullet

fission technology, futuristic as yet, may eventually harness the limitless supply of heavywater: D2O.

Unlike 235U which undergoes slow neutron fission, 238U does not (it undergoes fission on bombarding with fast neutrons in reactions that are hard to control). The simplest way to extract nuclear energy, therefore, is to use 235U, as the conventional 'burning' type reactors do. An alternative is to breed 239Pu94 (plutonium) from 238U, by neutron capture and electron emission, because 239Pu94 is fissionable by slow neutrons. Actually, the radioactive decay series of interest to nuclear power generation are three:

 

bullet

The decay of uranium isotope 238U to the lead isotope 208Pb.

bullet

The decay of uranium isotope 235U to the lead isotope 207Pb, and

bullet

The decay of thorium isotope 232Th to the lead isotope 208Pb.

 

These three radioactive decay series are shown below (numbers on the vertical axes here denote atomic mass, those on the horizontal axes the atomic number) while the box alongside explains where the energy in radioactivity comes from.

Energy released
by radioactive decay


Let us use the Einstein equation
 

ΔE = (Δm0)c2


to convert the rest mass (m0) into energy (E). For m0 = 1.66×10-27 kg (this is unified atomic mass unit u and is set such that the mass of 12C6 atom is 12u) and c (speed of light) = 3×108 m/sec, the energy equivalent of 1 u = (1.66×10-27 kg)×(3×108 m/sec)2 = 1.49×10-10 J = 931.5 MeV (mega-electron volts)  because 1 MeV = 1.6×10-13 J. For an electron (mass = 9.11×10-31 kg = 0.00549u), this energy works out to 0.51 MeV.

 

Suppose we bombard a 235U92 atom with 1 neutron, to get the reaction
 

235U92 + 1 n à 90Sr38 + 136Xe54 + 10 n.

 

Before Fission

After Fission

1 n

1.0087 u

235U92

235.0439 u

90Sr38

89.9073 u

136Xe54

135.9072 u

10 n

10.0867 u

Total =

236.0526 u

Total =

235.9012 u

 

Thus, mass difference = 0.1514 u = 141 MeV, i.e., 0.1514 u of rest mass disappears during this fission, releasing 141 MeV of energy for each fissioning 235U92 atom (the average of all fission reactions for 235U92 is about 200 MeV per 235U92 atom).

   
bullet Why is thorium not an energy source?

Of these three, only uranium is presently being used in power generation, however. Why not thorium? Scarcity is not the issue here.
Thorium occurs in thorite and in thorianite. Large deposits of thorium minerals have been reported in Maine and in the beach sands of Kerala, India, but these have not yet been exploited. Thorium is now thought to be about three times as abundant as uranium and about as abundant as lead or molybdenum. Thorium is recovered commercially from the mineral monazite.

T
he problem is one of operation. There is probably more energy available for use from thorium in the minerals of the earth's crust than from both uranium and fossil fuels. But any sizable demand from thorium as a nuclear fuel is still several years in the future. Work has been done in developing thorium cycle converter-reactor systems, but they are not expected to become important commercially for many years because of certain operating difficulties.
 
bullet More on uranium

Uranium is of great importance as a nuclear fuel. Uranium-238 can be converted into fissionable plutonium by the following reactions:

238U(n, gamma) ® 239U ® (beta) ® 239Np ® (beta) ® 239Pu

This nuclear conversion can be brought about in breeder reactors where it is possible to produce more new fissionable material than the fissionable material used in maintaining the chain reaction.

Uranium-235 is of even greater importance because it is the key to utilizing uranium. 235U, while occurring in natural uranium to the extent of only 0.71%, is so fissionable with slow neutrons that a self-sustaining fission chain reaction can be made in a reactor constructed from natural uranium and a suitable moderator, such as heavy water or graphite, alone.

Natural uranium, slightly enriched with 235U by a small percentage, is used to fuel nuclear power reactors to generate electricity. Natural thorium can be irradiated with neutrons as follows to produce the important isotope 233U: 232Th(n, gamma) ® 233Th ® (beta) ® 233Pa ―(beta) ® 233U. While thorium itself is not fissionable, 233U is, and in this way may be used as a nuclear fuel. One pound of completely fissioned uranium has the fuel value of over 1500 tons of coal.

Uranium itself occurs in the minerals like pitchblende, uraninite, carnotite, autunite, uranophane, and tobernite and is also found in phosphate rock, lignite, and monazite sands from which it can be commercially recovered. Uranium has sixteen isotopes, all of which are radioactive. Most of the naturally occurring uranium is 238U (~99%), however, with small amounts of 235U (~0.7%) and 234U (0.005%). Noting that the half life of 238U to 206Pb decay series is about the same as the age of the earth, whereas the decay of 235U to 207Pb has gone through more than six half lives during this period, this is hardly a matter of surprise. As a corollary to this, you will also notice that the Pb in the periodic table has atomic mass number 207.
 

bullet Interestingly though, and irrespective of whether we use burning or breeder reactors, the question for nuclear energy is not whether we have adequate supplies of uranium or not but whether the gains are not offset by the risks associated with plant safety and the problem of waste disposal.

Nonetheless, over 16% of the world's electricity is generated from uranium in nuclear reactors. This amounts to about

2400 billion kWh each year, as much as from all sources of electricity worldwide in 1960. In a current perspective, it is twelve times Australia's or South Africa's total electricity production, five times India's, twice China's and 500 times Kenya's total. It comes from over 430 nuclear reactors with a total output capacity of more than 350 000 megawatts (MWe) operating in 31 countries. A further thirty reactors are under construction, and another 70 are on the drawing board.

 
Futuristic Energy sources
 
bullet What about the fusion technology?

 

bullet Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion


"The oceans cover a little more than 70 percent of the Earth's surface. This makes them the world's largest solar energy collector and energy storage system. On an average day, 60 million square kilometers (23 million square miles) of tropical seas absorb an amount of solar radiation equal in heat content to about 250 billion barrels of oil. If less than one-tenth of one percent of this stored solar energy could be converted into electric power, it would supply more than 20 times the total amount of electricity consumed in the United States on any given day."

(from NREL's OTEC Home Page: Click on the image below to visit this site and learn more about the possibilities of using this energy source)

While NREL is no longer active in OTEC research, these two links will give you some interesting information:

NREL's Introduction to Ocean Energy

U.S. Department of Energy's Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion Systems


 

bullet Gas Hydrate Gel


Look into these references


LITHOLOGY OF THE UPPER GAS HYDRATE ZONE, BLAKE OUTER RIDGE: A ...

OCEAN DRILLING PROGRAM LEG 164 PRELIMINARY REPORT GAS HYDRATE ...

SEISMIC AND THERMAL INVESTIGATIONS OF THE BLAKE RIDGE GAS ...